Business knowledge and rules

Discuss the rule
and its basis.

Explain the concepts, conditions and calculations used in your work with their context. Keep accepting a definition distinct from executing an operation in a real system.

Make sure the same word means the same thing.

“Active customer”, “completed work” and “approved request” may mean different things in different organisations and systems. Consider a concept’s definition, scope, owner and related business knowledge explicitly.

The business-knowledge approach distinguishes terms, facts, constraints, triggers, inferences and calculations. A calculated result is not presented as having the same basis as a value read from a source.

State when a condition applies, and to whom.

A rule needs more than its text. Who, what, where, when, why and how make a definition understandable. Its period of validity can differ from the time it was recorded in a system.

Missing information is not automatically treated as eligible or ineligible. Conflicting evidence and unknown results must remain visible during evaluation.

Separate definition, evaluation and execution.

Xohre’s target is to treat a business rule as knowledge that can be discussed and traced to its basis. An example evaluation or simulation is not an operation performed in a real source system.

Real execution remains subject to source-system permissions and business rules. This content design does not promise a general rules engine or ready-made automation for every organisation.

EXAMPLE ACTIVITY

Clarify what an acceptance condition means.

A team discovers that people interpret “requests with no missing documents proceed to approval” in different ways.

01

Define the concept

Clarify which documents and request types are meant.

02

Separate the condition

Consider the rule, its basis and its exceptions as distinct knowledge.

03

Evaluate an example

Make uncertainty visible when a request contains missing or conflicting information.

04

Connect to the authoritative system

Consider the real application separately through the relevant source’s supported operation and validation.

AT THE END

A rule definition that makes business language and responsibility for real operations clear in the same discussion.

WHAT REMAINS?

01

Concepts with clear scope and ownership

02

Rule knowledge with an explicit basis and timing

03

A distinction between simulation and real execution

YOUR QUESTIONS

A closer
look.

Does this page promise a ready-made automation engine?

No. It describes the target approach to business knowledge and rules. General source execution and selection of a detailed engine design are separate scopes.

Does approving a rule make it valid in every source system?

No. The rule’s scope, authoritative owner and source-system validation must be considered separately.

Make room for
your next shared idea.

Bring ideas, records and decisions into the same context.